iiiiiiiiiiiiiia @ 2010-10-01T10: 46:00
Joint statement on the possible removal of my work on exhibit in the Louvre
In the media came out a lot of material about the scandal connected with the exhibition. And almost everywhere carefully avoiding the question of Mavromatti.
It is not strange, it's hypocritical!
hypocritical and more. Make a fetish of the images. Dilute such a fuss about the picture, recognize their significant and valuable, and not try to understand their meaning.
If my works good enough in the Louvre, so listen well, and me!
again not too lazy to repeat all the fuss brewing me not to take pictures France, and to extend the passport Oleg Mavromatti. I clearly wrote in the letter. In the consular department of the Russian Foreign Ministry: ( http://teroganian.livejournal.com/274870.html?nc=5 ), Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation: ( http://teroganian.livejournal.com/275167.html?nc=2 ) and the Louvre: ( http://teroganian.livejournal.com/271128.html?nc=42 ), that refuse to participate in the exhibition without a decision on the extension of the passport Mavromatti. These works and I can send e-mails with one click. Today, they write that the problem with the removal of my work is almost solved backroom way, and the incident is settled. It is not so!
Enough "to include fool "!
I demand an official export works only because the ban on exports also argue absurdly, as the prosecution Maromatti, my, Erofeev, Samodurov as incitement to religious hatred. Actually, Mavromatti accused of the same was accused and my paintings. This is a complete idiocy!
about it right said Deputy Culture Minister Andrei Gagarin: "These works of the author Avdei Ter-Oganyan of a series of" radical abstraction "is an abstract pictures - paintings (...) with the signatures, which can be interpreted as appeals to violent change of constitutional system, inciting national and religious hatred ". ( http://inosmi.ru/politic/20100930/163301824.html # comm )
Therefore, the main problem - the solution to the problem with Mavromatti!
And if you can solve the problem with paintings formally or informally, it does not matter is addressed with the extension of a passport. It is not the abstract principles.
artist threatens is a real danger!
matter in a living man!
I fully realize that my lack of participation in the exhibition - not a particularly strong argument for the MFA, and therefore once again appeal to his colleagues artists to boycott the exhibition, without solving the problem arising from Mavromatti.
I did not give Marat Gelman no written permission for the participation of these works in the exhibition, and despite the fact that Gelman is the owner, the Louvre has no right to expose them without моего разрешения.
оригинал http://teroganian.livejournal.com/277574.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment